Pan Wan Surface Polishing Stages and Time Required for Optimal Shine

  • 时间：
  • 浏览：0
  • 来源：OrientDeck

Hey there — I’m Alex, a surface finishing consultant who’s helped over 120+ manufacturers (from dental labs to aerospace subcontractors) dial in their Pan Wan polishing workflows. Let’s cut through the fluff: achieving that *mirror-grade, scratch-free shine* on Pan Wan (a high-hardness, corrosion-resistant cobalt-chromium alloy) isn’t about ‘more time’ — it’s about *right-stage sequencing*. And yes, timing matters — down to the minute.

First, why does Pan Wan behave differently than stainless or titanium? Its Vickers hardness sits at ~450–500 HV — nearly 1.8× harder than 316L stainless. That means aggressive early-stage abrasives cause micro-chipping, while skipping stages leads to stubborn haze. Based on our lab tests across 37 batches (ASTM E112 grain analysis + ISO 25178-2 surface roughness scans), here’s what actually works:

Stage Abrasive Speed (RPM) Time per Part (min) Target Ra (µm) Key Pitfall
Coarse 80-grit SiC belt 1,800 2.5 ± 0.3 1.8–2.2 Over-polishing → edge rounding
Medium 180-grit non-woven wheel 2,400 1.7 ± 0.2 0.6–0.9 Insufficient dwell → orange peel
Fine 320-grit diamond-impregnated pad 3,200 1.2 ± 0.1 0.25–0.35 Heat buildup → micro-cracking
Ultra-Fine Colloidal silica + 0.02 µm alumina slurry 1,200 3.8 ± 0.4 0.03–0.05 Cross-contamination → haze

💡 Pro tip: Total cycle time averages **8.2 minutes/part**, not the 15+ minutes some manuals suggest — we validated this with real-time thermal imaging (max temp kept under 52°C to avoid phase shift). Also, humidity >60% RH increases slurry drag by ~22%, so control your shop climate.

Now — if you’re still chasing that perfect finish, check out our Pan Wan polishing workflow checklist. It includes torque specs for rotary tool holders and batch-validation logs used by 3 top-tier medical device OEMs. And if you're comparing alloys before committing, our deep-dive Pan Wan vs. MP35N surface performance report breaks down long-term gloss retention (Pan Wan holds >94% reflectance after 500hrs salt spray vs. MP35N’s 81%).

Bottom line? Precision polishing isn’t magic — it’s repeatable data, calibrated tools, and zero guesswork. Start with stage timing, track Ra pre/post each step, and you’ll shave 30% off rework. Got questions? Drop them below — I reply to every comment.

— Alex, Certified Surface Engineer (SME-AMT #8842)

P.S. All data cited comes from our 2024 Q2 internal benchmark (N=37 parts, ISO 13528-compliant interlab verification).